Policy

Democrats emphasize border security as midterms loom

The emphasis comes as the political party falls short on legislative wins on clearing

A barrier stretches along the U.S.-Mexico border on the Johnson Ranch near Columbus, N.M., in April 2021.  (Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call file photo)
A bulwark stretches forth the U.S.-United mexican states border on the Johnson Ranch almost Columbus, N.K., in April 2021. (Bill Clark/CQ Roll Telephone call file photo)

Posted March 22, 2022 at ten:56am

Just weeks ago, President Joe Biden signaled a messaging shift on immigration that reflects the rhetoric many moderate Democrats take been using for months.

"If nosotros are to advance liberty and justice, nosotros need to secure the edge and set the immigration system," he told Congress during his Land of the Union. "We can do both."

He went on to detail new edge engineering to detect drug smuggling and joint patrols with Mexico to catch human being traffickers, before mentioning a pathway to citizenship for so-called Dreamers, undocumented immigrants brought to the U.Southward. as children.

Biden struck a noticeably dissimilar tone on immigration than he did a year earlier, when he had touted a sweeping overhaul of immigration policy that would legalize millions. The change reflects a sober reality for a political party that has yet to accomplish its legislative clearing goals and faces tough electoral headwinds this fall.

It also comes every bit moderate Democrats, specially those facing reelection, emphasize border security every bit a key office of their immigration message.

"Nosotros've got a crunch on the southern Arizona border," said Sen. Mark Kelly, D-Ariz. "I talk about information technology, because information technology's an issue for my country and for my constituents. And I also remember it'due south a national security issue."

The growing focus partly reflects the political success Republicans have had in slamming Democrats on immigration. Just it besides reflects Democrats' acknowledgment that for many voters — particularly those in border regions or areas devastated by illegal drugs — a strong border is a peak priority.

Bipartisan efforts

Speaking most border security in tandem with clearing reform is nothing new. A 2013 bipartisan plan that passed the Senate but never got a House vote would accept carved out a pathway to citizenship while calculation tens of thousands of new Edge Patrol agents.

And as recently every bit 2018, there was talk of a possible agreement that would combine legalization for Dreamers with former President Donald Trump's signature edge wall.

"For well-nigh Democrats, border security has always been a office of the conversation effectually immigration reform," said Theresa Cardinal Brown, manager of immigration and cross-border policy at the Bipartisan Policy Heart.

Today, there's all the same an appetite for immigration policy changes that too seek to streamline activities at the U.South.-Mexico border, which just saw its busiest year of border crossings since the government began keeping track.

Final year, Sens. John Cornyn, R-Texas, and Kyrsten Sinema, D-Ariz., introduced wide legislation that would address migration increases by ramping up staffing at clearing agencies and streamlining immigration courtroom proceedings. Information technology too would directly the Department of Justice to prioritize removal cases involving migrants apprehended during an influx.

The bill has even so to be marked upward in committee, merely information technology has gained traction among moderate lawmakers. Sen. Maggie Hassan, D-Northward.H., who is up for reelection in the fall, added her support last calendar month.

"New Hampshire knows firsthand how important it is to secure our border and make sure the brave border security personnel accept the resources and back up they demand to strengthen border security, stop the menses of illegal drugs from entering our communities, and better the vetting and screening of those entering our state," she said.

Legislative troubles

Despite the presence of border security resources in nearly every celebrated attempt at immigration overhaul, Democrats noticeably left it out of their sweeping budget reconciliation program, which would accept granted a pathway to citizenship for millions and cutting visa backlogs in the legal immigration system.

The reconciliation bill foundered amid opposition from moderates, and Democratic lawmakers are now eyeing a narrower version that may non include clearing at all.

That leaves an opening for some Democrats to pursue a dissimilar approach, contending that Republican solutions to illegal migration don't accost deep-seated issues in the outdated American immigration arrangement.

"You take to talk about it equally a comprehensive message — that they kind of work together," said Rep. Ruben Gallego, D-Ariz., who chairs the Congressional Hispanic Caucus' campaign arm. "In that location is no border security without immigration reform."

Republicans take long argued that Biden's efforts to disengage stringent Trump-era clearing policies, including the expulsion of unaccompanied migrant children under the public health directive Title 42 and construction of a border wall, accept encouraged illegal migration. Many scoff at Biden'due south commitment to securing the border.

"We need to secure our border before information technology is also tardily," said Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., after Biden's speech earlier this month. "Our border is completely cleaved, terrorists can come up beyond, drugs are flowing at the highest level in history."

Although uniformly opposed to the edge wall, many Democrats have backed increased resources for Border Patrol agents, who must balance traditional tasks like combating drug cartels with processing vulnerable migrants, including children, seeking asylum in the U.S.

"Nosotros need to have a border in which the law is enforced and people are treated humanely," said Matt Bending, a Democratic strategist and consultant with the Lone Star Project, which works to elect Democrats in Texas. "That ways putting enough resource on the border."

Angle said Democrats should paint themselves every bit members of the party of legitimate solutions — in contrast with a GOP that uses migration spikes to its political reward.

"When the border is in chaos, Republicans benefit," he said. "Information technology's really of import for Democrats to not walk into that behave trap."

What voters want

Meanwhile, lawmakers battling for reelection are listening closely to what their constituents desire — including a secure border that prevents the menstruation of illegal drugs.

Rep. Elissa Slotkin, D-Mich., who represents a swing commune, introduced legislation concluding month that would require the Department of Homeland Security to develop a comprehensive plan to identify, deploy and integrate emerging technologies to enhance "situational awareness" forth U.S. borders.

"Our clearing arrangement is broken, and politicians in both parties have been complicit in failing to responsibly address it for decades," she said in a news release after the bill's introduction. "The only way to really deal with this issue is past working across the aisle."

Rep. Abigail Spanberger of Virginia, some other moderate Democrat seeking reelection, said during a committee hearing last calendar month that she supports hiring more Edge patrol officers. Immigrants, she said, should come to the U.Southward. through "lawful and orderly" channels.

"When I travel around my district I practise hear from constituents who are frustrated about the ongoing crisis and the challenges we face in our southern border," she said. "And my constituents are right to expect a secure border and right to expect a lawful clearing organization that works."

Congress recently proved it tin can movement bipartisan border legislation that'south narrower in scope. Earlier this calendar month, the Business firm passed, 387-33, a bill to improve security forth the U.S.-Mexico border by reclassifying a special police unit within U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement so it can more finer combat illegal activity.

Brown, of the Bipartisan Policy Center, said policies supported by both Republicans and Democrats play well with voters, peculiarly during a time of historic partisan divides.

"The longer and more that Congress struggles to find a way forward on these things, earthworks in their heels on either side or using the issue is electoral fodder — the farther they are from actually moving forward on policies that will amend the situation," she said.

"Doesn't take to be perfect, merely for God's sake, practise something."